What makes AltaClaro's training model different?

Unlike traditional passive learning, AltaClaro uses a learn-by-doing model. Participants complete practical exercises that simulate real-world legal work and receive personalized feedback from seasoned practitioners, bridging the gap between theory and practice.

Is it difficult to implement AltaClaro's training programs?

No--AltaClaro programs are turn-key. We work with your organization to determine the course schedule, then our learning success team takes on the administrative lift.

Who provides the feedback on assignments?

Our feedback is provided by a global network of distinguished practitioners, including current and former BigLaw partners and senior in-house counsel, who have deep, practical expertise in their subject areas.

Is this just watching pre-recorded videos?

No. While we use video for instruction, the core of our platform is interactive. The learning comes from completing hands-on assignments and receiving feedback on your work.

Are AltaClaro courses eligible for CLE credit?

Yes, many of our courses are eligible for Continuing Legal Education (CLE) credit in multiple jurisdictions. Please see individual course pages for specific CLE information.

Does AltaClaro provide any data or feedback related to learner experience and performance?

Yes. Through our proprietary Benchmark360 product, we provide robust, data-driven feedback on learner performance at the individual and firm level, driving self-assessment, self-reflection, and actionable insights around mentoring opportunities.

Law Firm AI Training Isn't Working. Here's What Has to Change.

In her latest article for The American Lawyer, AltaClaro Chief Learning Officer Patricia A. Libby tackles a question the legal industry can no longer avoid: why do AI blunders keep happening at top law firms, even when policies and training are already in place?

Drawing on a recent high-profile incident — where lawyers reportedly misrepresented what real cases said — Patricia argues that these failures aren't technology failures. They're judgment failures: the inability to read critically, verify skeptically, and question whether an AI-generated source actually says what it claims to say.

Most law firm AI training is still passive — lunch-and-learns, PDFs, CLE webinars, and compliance quizzes. These build awareness, but they don't build skill. And awareness alone won't help a lawyer catch a polished-but-wrong AI output under real deadline pressure.

The solution: Experiential, scenario-based training rooted in deliberate practice. Lawyers — and especially the partners and managers who supervise them — need to be put into realistic situations, make actual judgment calls, sit with the discomfort of uncertainty, and receive structured feedback. That's how professional judgment is built, and that's the gap effective training is designed to close.

If you're looking for an AI training solution that meets these criteria, you can learn more about AltaClaro's Gen AI courses here.